Video-Making Workshop at SE Climate Science Center

IMG_1714Last week, I taught a video-making workshop on the North Carolina State University campus hosted by the Southeast Climate Science Center (US Dept. of Interior). The workshop was held in the James B. Hunt, Jr. Library (photo at left) a fantastic facility for a video workshop as you’ll see in a moment. I was invited to teach the workshop by Jerry McMahon, Director of SE CSC, and logistics were arranged by Aranzazu Lascurain, Program Coordinator for SE CSC.

The 1.5 day workshop was a combination of lecture, discussion, and hands-on exercises. The goal was to demystify the video-making process and teach the basics of planning, shooting, editing, and publishing a video. There were about twenty participants (students, faculty, and staff) who each came with an idea for a video that they would develop during the workshop. I provided some background and basic information about each phase of the video-making process, and then participants would practice using their individual video projects. Participants used mobile devices (phones, tablets) to film and edit, and the library provided iPads and iPad minis for those without them. We also periodically watched examples of science videos and discussed the pros and cons of each.

The first day of the workshop was held in the “Creativity Studio”—a high-tech “white-box” IMG_1719space for teaching, learning, and collaboration and features high-definition projectors and movable/writable walls. At left is a photo of workshop participants during the video planning exercise.

After lunch, we covered filming, and participants set off in pairs to shoot footage. The idea was to take turns filming and being filmed on camera. One group took advantage of the library location and interviewed people about how scientists could be better communicators.

IMG_1704On the second day of the workshop, we moved to the Teaching and Visualization Lab, a “black-box” space that offers 270-degree immersive projection on three walls for a total of 80 linear feet of display surface (see photo at right). We covered movie editing and publishing and reviewed some of the participants’ video projects.

I was impressed with the variety of ideas and approaches that the participants employed in their video projects. It was an intense teaching and learning experience for me, but I was pleased with how well everything went. There were a few technical glitches, but we managed in spite of them. And everyone seemed to have fun and to enjoy the video-making process.

The iPhone: A Film Studio in Your Pocket

One of the biggest misconceptions I encounter about video-making is the belief that one needs special equipment (expensive cameras and microphones), a film studio, and special training to make a quality video. That was perhaps true in the past, but not today. The iPhone in particular has made filmmaking accessible to anyone who wants to create a short video or a full-length documentary. In fact, award-winning films have been partially or totally shot with an iPhone. The following are a few examples.

Some of the footage for the documentary, “Searching for Sugarman” was shot on an iPhone because the director, Malik Bendjelloul, ran out of money. Most of the film was shot on Super 8mm, but a few final scenes were filmed with an iPhone and 8mm Vintage Camera app. I highly recommend this film, by the way, which won an Academy Award in 2013 for Best Documentary Feature. Fantastic example of how to tell a story. Below is the trailer for the film (if you cannot see the player window on your device, here’s the link):

A feature film, “And Uneasy Lies the Mind” was shot entirely with an iPhone 5. The director, Ricky Fosheim, explains in the trailer below why he chose the iPhone and displays some of the accessories he used (link to video in case you can’t see the player window on your device):

Here is a film featuring beautiful imagery from Thailand that was filmed with an iPhone 4s and edited with Final Cut Pro; a Vimeo “Staff Pick” (here’s the direct link to the film):

The next film was made by French filmmaker Maël Sevestre with an iPhone 4s and shows what kind of interesting cinematography can be accomplished with a cell phone camera (if you can’t see the player window, follow this link):

And there is even an iPhone Film Festival. Here’s a music video, “Summer Wine”, that won second place in that category (can’t see the player window? here’s the direct link):

I hope these few examples convince you that you can make an excellent video with your iPhone. I’m now shooting a lot of my tutorials with my iPhone 5s because of the portability and ease of use. With the launch of iPhone 6, which has an even better camera (1080p high definition film at 60 frames per second, video stabilization, 128 gigabytes of storage), amateur and professional filmmakers will have even more moviemaking power in their pockets. And combined with simple but powerful movie-editing apps like iMovie, the iPhone becomes an amazing film studio that you can carry with you anywhere.

How Video Can Help You Give Better Talks

I’ve heard that Jill Bolte-Taylor practiced her TED talk (My Stroke of Insight) 200 times. Was it worth the effort? Apparently so. Her talk has been viewed over 15 million times–one of the most popular on the TED website. Of course, her compelling story about suffering a stroke at the age of 37 and her thoughts about it from the viewpoint of a neuroanatomist had something to do with its immense popularity. However, her delivery was spell-binding. And that required a great deal of planning, effort, and, yes, practice.

I give this example to make a point or two about practicing your science talks and to make a suggestion about how to improve your performance.

Those of us in science often practice our conference talks and seminars only in our heads—rarely out loud—you know who you are. And it shows. The last conference I attended was filled with the usual boring, rambling, droning presentations that often went overtime, and my thought, sitting in the audience, was that these presenters probably had no idea how terrible they sounded. They probably thought their presentations were fine, perhaps even brilliant. Who’s going to tell them otherwise? “Hey, Professor Hotshot, your talk sucked!”

Students are told to practice, practice, practice their talks. Some do, but many try to emulate their professors—the ones who put their slides together the night before their session and then just wing it. Of course, the professor has a lot more experience speaking extemporaneously and also can get away with giving a bad talk occasionally. A student or early-career scientist cannot afford to take chances—especially in a high-stakes situation like a job interview seminar. In fact, it is just such a situation that a speaker must be well-practiced. An outstanding talk may be the main factor distinguishing the successful job candidate from the rest of the pack. The speaker not only must have internalized the talk’s content, but their voice, facial expressions, and body language should exude confidence, not nervousness or uncertainty.

So, how do you know if your talk is good or still needs some more practice? Well, how many professional talks have you given? One or two? If so, you probably need more practice than someone who has given fifty talks. If you consider yourself an experienced speaker, do people routinely tell you afterwards that your talk was great—without any prompting from you? No? Then perhaps some change is in order.

How can you assess the effectiveness of a particular presentation or, more generally, your speaking skills?

The typical advice is to give the talk to a group of friends or colleagues—several times, if possible. This is a good idea, especially for novices or anyone planning to deliver a high-stakes talk. However, this approach may not be possible or always convenient. We also may be reluctant to impose on others. Even when some speakers do get feedback, they fail to act on the suggestions because they don’t believe (or don’t want to believe) that their performance is less than stellar.

The other, less common, advice is to use video to record a speaker’s performance. I’ve found that students can especially benefit from watching videos of their speeches—particularly students who won’t accept critical comments from the audience. Actually seeing themselves fidgeting, mumbling, or rocking back and forth makes it difficult to deny what others are telling them. Often, observing themselves on camera is a great eye-opener, even for a seasoned speaker. So I think it’s a great idea to video yourself giving your presentation and then watch it to see where it needs improvement. This approach literally puts you in the audience’s shoes. You can see how you and your presentation will look to others. Is it understandable? Are there parts that are too fast, too slow? Is your voice clear and steady or squeaky and annoying? Are you using inappropriate gestures or standing like a statue? What overall impression does your body language and voice convey?

Some will balk at the advice to practice out loud and especially to use video to review their performance. “It’s too much work.” “I don’t have time–my talk is next week and I still don’t have my slides prepared!” “My delivery is fine; I don’t need to see a video to know this.” Well, I can tell you from watching videos of my talks that my perception of how well (or not) I was doing during the talk did not necessarily agree with what I saw on tape later. If you’ve never seen yourself giving a talk, then you may be in for a big surprise. You might discover that you have a distracting mannerism or that your body language says, “I don’t have a clue what I’m doing.” You might see that you spend too much time looking at your slides instead of the audience. Your voice may be a droning monotone that puts people to sleep. These are all problems of delivery that practice can help. And video can help you see what those problems are and whether you are improving with practice.

I’m surprised more people don’t use video to practice and improve their talks. Unlike when I was a student, making a video today is as easy as pulling out your cell phone. Modern smartphones have excellent video cameras, and you can use one to record and review your science talks. Here are a few tips:

1. To practice speaking, the idea is to simulate the conditions you’ll experience during the real talk as closely as possible. Stand up in front of your slides and deliver your talk out loud. Use a remote control to advance your slides; practice with a laser pointer if you plan to use one.

2. You might record your presentation in a small conference room that has a projector and screen. If that is not possible, then you’ll have to improvise in an office, laboratory, or at home. If you don’t have access to a projector, it may be possible to mirror your presentation on a TV screen. If you have Apple TV, you’ll be able to do this easily.

3. Try to stabilize your video recording device on a tripod, desk, shelf, or table and position it a sufficient distance away from you to film your entire body (or most of it).

4. If you use a phone or tablet as a recording device, be sure to position it in landscape orientation to record video.

5. It’s advantageous to have an audience for at least one of your practice videos because you want to record how well you make eye contact with audience members and also how you handle questions. If this is not possible, you might pin up photographs of people’s faces around the room to simulate an audience.

6. You might find it convenient to film your practice presentation in short segments instead of one long recording. This way, you can more easily review specific parts without having to wade through the entire film—especially if your talk is an hour long. You could divide the film, for example, at natural breaks: background/introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions.

7. Review your video with a critical eye and ear for timing, body language, gestures, facial expressions, eye contact, and voice. If you spot a problem, try to figure out when and why it occurs, which may help you address it. For example, you may um and ah a lot whenever you get to information that you’re less confident about. Perhaps you need to rethink what you want to say so that you are more certain.

8. You may have to watch your video performance several times to let the initial shock (of seeing yourself as others do) wear off. However, you will become accustomed to seeing and hearing yourself on film and be able to watch critically.

9. It also helps to watch your video performance with someone else who can help you spot problems and to make suggestions for improvement. Students could work together to review each others’ videos, for example. You also could share your practice video with an advisor or some other mentor who may not have been able to hear the talk in person. Perhaps they are on sabbatical or doing fieldwork, but you really want their input. They can review the video and give you some additional feedback.

10. Courses designed to teach students how to give a scientific presentation would greatly benefit from having some or all of the talks recorded on video and reviewed by the instructor and classmates.

Very few people are naturally gifted speakers. Most of us have to work at it, but It’s difficult to improve if you have no idea of what you are doing wrong. Recording yourself with video can be an easy way to identify and correct problems.

Marmosets Find Instructional Video Useful

OK, I know you’re sick of me yammering on about the value of video in science communication and what a great tool it is in teaching others how to perform a scientific technique. However, I could not resist pointing out a recent study that showed wild marmosets learning how to open a box to get a food reward—by, you guessed it, watching a methods video!

Tina Gunhold, a cognitive biology researcher at the University of Vienna, filmed captive marmosets retrieving a piece of food from a clear plastic box (representing an artificial fruit) and created a video featuring their techniques for gaining access to the food reward. She and coauthors then set up the box in the field (Brazil) along with a laptop showing the video of laboratory marmosets lifting a lid or opening a drawer to get at the food. The researchers then filmed wild marmosets (108 in all) who either saw the instructional video or served as controls (saw only a static image of a marmoset standing next to the box).

Only twelve of the wild marmosets were able to open the box and get the food. However, of this group, eleven had watched the instructional video and only one of the controls figured it out on her own. The choice of technique by the successful participants did not appear to be random but was predominately the method they saw in the video. Also, the instructional video group showed more attempts at manipulation of the box than did the control group. The researchers described their findings in the journal Biology Letters (Gunhold, T., Whiten, A. & Bugnyar, T. Biol. Lett. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0439 (2014)).

The video below shows one group of wild marmosets investigating the experimental setup and their response (Video Credit: Tina Gunhold) (if you cannot see the video player window on your device, you can watch the video here):

The authors conclude: “To our knowledge, this is the first study that used video demonstrations in the wild and demonstrated the potent force of social learning, even from unfamiliar conspecifics, under field conditions.”

Scientist videographers, take note.

A Site to Post Your Video Abstracts

I’ve written previously about what video abstracts are, how they can influence visibility of your research papers, and how to create a video abstract from start to finish. The beauty of video abstracts is that they are freely accessible on media-sharing platforms, unlike many journal articles locked behind paywalls. As I’ve said before, people cannot cite your work if they are unaware of it.

One of the issues I touched upon in describing video abstracts is the fact that few journals offer the option for authors to submit and display a video abstract. I think this is slowly changing as more publishers see the value of video in making scientific articles published in journals more discoverable.

In the meantime, what is an author to do if their journal of choice lacks this option?

As I suggested previously, an author can always post their video abstract on their own website, perhaps in their list of publications. Instead of a boring list of pubs, visitors to your professional website will see a video player with a visual abstract explaining your paper. There is now another alternative: WeShareScience, a website that allows users to create a video abstract (with an online tool) or to upload one created elsewhere. When you visit the site, you see a Pinterest-type platform with “pinned videos”, which can be grouped onto boards, which organize videos by topic. There is a browse option to see videos organized by discipline or topic. There are social media options allowing a visitor to “follow” a researcher as well as to share a video with others. Here’s a screenshot:

screenshot_wesharescience_videos

The site was created by Ryan Watkins, an associate professor at George Washington University in Washington D.C., to facilitate teaching students in his courses. He wanted to use video-based, rather than text-based, assignments to assess student learning. That is, he would assign students the task of creating a video abstract about research they were reading in class, and he could assess how well they understood it by the video they produced. Of course, it also taught them an essential communication tool that will be needed by 21st century scientists. The WeShareScience platform was created to allow students to more easily create video abstracts and for him to easily aggregate and organize the student videos. The WeShareScience site is also open to anyone wishing to create a board to display their own research or that of someone else. Ryan has written an article, published on the Wiley Exchanges blog, about his approach to student learning. Another article on the Wiley Exchanges blog by Victoria Dickerson focuses on using video abstracts to enhance the visibility and usability of journal articles.

Check out WeShareScience and see what you think. The availability of such platforms will likely increase in the future, so that there may be other options to promote the visibility of your research. However, I do recommend that you submit your video abstract to the journal (if they provide that option), since research by Scott Spicer shows that a majority of views occur on the journal’s website compared to views on YouTube. However, you may reach additional viewers, especially those outside your field, by posting a video abstract on a media-sharing platform (YouTube, Figshare). If you know of other platforms where researchers can post video abstracts, please leave a comment.